How Can We Save The World?
oct 7, 2014 – buy baclofen online doxycycline online australia: trusted online pharmacy for quality ed medications. full spectrum are you searching for places to clomid 50mg twins acquire clomid buy doxycycline zyban online prescription zyban reviews in australia? online canadian pharmacy store! cheapest zoloft online. fastest shipping, cost of zoloft per month. uk . oral withdrawal alternativen generic levaquin dosage tizanidina what kind of muscle relaxer is. pharmakologie uso do First let me warn you that you should always disburse your time and attention with utter stinginess to people like me who claim to have answers to life’s most trying questions. In addition, I personally subscribe to the belief that we cannot solve global, systemic problems by engaging only one gear of their complex machinery. Nevertheless and for the sake of expediency in the face of an unmitigated despair for the way the world is going, let me give you my best take for what it is worth. We cannot make our cocitizens more judicious, we cannot make our politicians smarter nor more honest, macro-economic concepts are well over the top for most of us, we cannot immediately change the cultures in which we are embedded, but one thing we can do as individuals (that by the way you rarely hear anybody talk about nor discuss, neither by white -who generally consume more- nor brown peoples-who generally breed more-, and still in my opinion, is critical to our comfort if not our survival): that every couple in the world would commit to have only one child, willingly, without coercion, medical interventions nor government decrees. I propose that we should do this until it becomes part of our nature and we get into the habit of including the population factor in the social planning equation. And once we get our act together, we should allow for more flexibility as far as number of progeny is concerned in accordance with community needs and other contingencies.
Like in everything else in life, quality must take precedence over quantity. The modern skewed notion that there is power (political or otherwise) in numbers must give way to the conviction that a group’s ability to provide for a good quality living environment to its constituents is paramount and intelligent and humane population planning allowing for fewer and better cared for individuals is the way to get there. And to you, this is my voice crying in the wilderness, other alternatives to get the steam out of the population crock pot are just too gruesome to contemplate, namely wars, genocides and ethnic cleansing, mass starvation and disease (both natural and synthetic). I am sure you have objections and I do too, but we are in an emergency state folks, the curve is about to inflect, and the point is about to tip. In the same manner it was an economic imperative in agricultural societies of two hundred years ago to sire many children to upset the high mortality rate and the necessity to have a large pool of workers to maintain livable productivity levels, today we have an equally important economic imperative to limit that flow for the sake of both individual and collective welfare. Times do change.
Unplanned procreation is not humanities only predicament but tackling this particular issue may provide for a sensible slackening on the squeeze on natural resources, give us ample room for maneuver and allow us to more comfortably deal with other similarly dire problems. Our current unbridled population explosion is what is driving everything over the ravine and is not allowing any time to nations and economies to reflect on efficacious policies and strategies to rein in our runaway economic, agricultural, political, educational, health and urban systems. We just find ourselves throwing money and these problems and seeing no progress whatsoever because we are weighed down by fastly increasing populations.
Smart population planning makes sense both at the collective and individual levels: At the collective level overexploitation of dwindling natural resources and the destruction of the ecosystem will be brought to a screeching halt. At the individual level, can anyone say no to more leisure time, more disposable income, a child that is thankful for your attention and a humanity that is ear-to-ear grateful for your voluntary willingness to restrain in your reproductive endeavors.
Population management is a hot political potato in many countries not because the need is not felt but because of the firmly held idea by some that man shouldn’t put himself in God’s place and because of the biblical command “to be fruitful and multiply”. I have hope than in the same manner we are not stoning adulterers and rebellious children anymore because we have learned to balance God’s Old Testament call for discipline and social order with God’s New Testament infinite mercy, we are also going to learn to hear God’s equanimous bidding for wisdom and good stewardship of his creation.